As a mom with young children, I often see how much they look forward to their future at Lexington High School. To them, becoming a high schooler represents an important milestone—a time of growth, opportunity, and excitement. They talk about it with genuine hope and admiration, imagining the experiences and possibilities that await them.
That is why I am deeply concerned when I see the current conditions at LHS: overcrowded classrooms, inadequate and outdated facilities, failing infrastructure, and educational spaces that are far too small for the needs of our students. As a parent, it’s hard not to feel worried about what my children’s high school years might look like if these issues remain unaddressed. High school is a critical developmental stage for every young person—a time when students build independence, develop their identities, and prepare academically, socially, and emotionally for adulthood.
In a community like Lexington, where our students work incredibly hard and where we pride ourselves on exceptional educational opportunities, our facilities should rise to the same standard. Our kids deserve a high school environment that is safe, spacious, inspiring, and equipped to meet the needs of a modern education. Investing in a new Lexington High School is not just a construction project; it is an investment in the future of our children, our families, and our town.
When our young people—especially high schoolers on the cusp of adulthood—have the environment they need to thrive, the entire community benefits. A well-designed, updated, and supportive school helps cultivate confident, capable young adults who will contribute positively to society. For these reasons, I strongly endorse the Yes for Lexington campaign and hope others will join in supporting a brighter future for all of our children.

Lexington is 3rd in the state and 41st nationally ranked by US news and World report. I too attended there and also Monroe (elementary) and Muzzey Jr. High. Why did the school department not put in the maintenance to keep up the properties over the years? (demolition by neglect). Evidently the conditions did not affect test scores. I am wondering what dark money is coming from to support this campaign. I am voting no.