Rendering for a 100% affordable housing development Lexington, MA, imagines bringing to the intersection of Lowell St. and North St.
Rendering of 100 percent affordable housing development that could come to the intersection of Lowell St. and North St. / Source: Causeway Development

Causeway Development, the developer of the affordable housing complex Lexington imagines bringing to the intersection of Lowell St. and North St., presented its design on Thursday during its first community meeting. 

Causeway imagines building 40 dwellings at Parcel 68-44, the three-acre property the state gifted to Lexington in 1978

Elizabeth Whittaker, founder and principal at Merge Architects, the architecture firm designing the development, said her team aims to honor Lexington’s historical architecture by including inspiration from the mid-century modern style. She also aims to preserve as many native trees as possible and “make it feel like it’s nestled in the woods.”

Each unit would have a balcony and would be allotted one covered parking space. There would be five visitor spaces.

Source: Causeway Development
Source: Causeway Development

Causeway would finance the project. They would submit the plan to the state for a Project Eligibility Letter, or PEL, under the 40B program. If granted a PEL and the support of Lexington’s Select Board and Affordable Housing Trust, Causeway would then submit the project to the state’s Executive Office for Housing and Livable Communities for approval. To be eligible, at least 20 to 25 percent of the dwellings must be affordable, meaning residents must make 80 percent of Lexington’s area median income or less to live in the development. 

But the plan with this complex is to make 100 percent of the dwellings affordable. 

Dave Traggorth, principal at Causeway, noted “this is a lengthy process” and construction would not begin until the end of 2026 at the earliest. 

A few residents who attended the meeting said they were pleased with the design and believed the project is a good step in the direction of increasing affordable housing in town. 

“This is a very pleasant design. Anyone would be delighted to live here,” Bob Creech, a member of the Planning Board, commented in the Zoom chat during the community meeting. Several of the attendees gave his comment a ‘thumbs up.’

Other residents argued that 45 parking spaces is not enough to have on a site that hosts 40 dwellings and that the development would worsen traffic at an already busy intersection. 

Another resident expressed doubt that the land on which the development would be built can accommodate 40 dwellings because it abuts wetlands. 

Moving forward with plans to build this development was made possible by the passage of Article 33 during Town Meeting in 2024. That motion called for the town to authorize the Select Board to sell, lease, or dispose of the “land described as ‘Parcel 68-44,’ located on Lowell St. near the northeast corner of North St. and Lowell St., for the purposes of developing 100 [percent] affordable housing.” Approximately 95 percent of Town Meeting members voted in support of the motion. 

Following that affirmative vote, Lexington’s Affordable Housing Trust issued a request for proposals and received seven responses. Carol Kowalski, Lexington’s assistant town manager for development, then assembled a review team to evaluate those proposals. That team interviewed developers on Sept. 16 and shared its recommendation with the Trust during its Sept. 23 meeting. 

Traggorth said Causeway will host more community meetings in the future “to make sure [they] can get everybody’s comments.”

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Affordable Housing??

    “Residents must make 80% of Lexington’s median income” Lexington’s median household income is $220,000, so in order to live there you can make $180,000/ year. (doesn’t sound affordable to most Americans)

    1. Dear MA,
      As a community member, your thoughts and feelings are important, but I wish you had checked on how AMI is determined for our region as well as affordable housing economic feasibility analyses before posting. If Vicki had not posted a correction, many would have read your comment and walked away with a misunderstanding that quickly cascades and does harm to the hard work being done by our Affordable Housing Trust and others. If you want to create 100% affordable housing projects that have even tighter income limits, then you must be ready to pay higher taxes so that we can use more public funds to pay for the construction and management of these buildings and seriously relax permitting processes. They would not otherwise be economically feasible as they would be built at a loss – why should and how could a private business owner (a developer) do that?

    2. I will also add that the article does not state that all the units are being offered at 80% AMI. That part of the article refers to 40B eligibility. The request for proposals on this land was for a range of units from 30%-80% AMI to meet the target average of 60% of AMI. I am not 100% sure what the current proposal includes – I am sure you can find out by reaching out to the Affordable Housing Trust or reading through the documents available here: https://www.lexingtonma.gov/2222/Lowell-Street-Affordable-Housing

  2. Some very important information missing in this article. What is the square footage of each of these units and how many bedrooms are in each of these units? These numbers are important to at least guess at the number of children this project will attract to the Lexington school system.

Leave a comment
All commenters must be registered and logged in with a verified email address. To register for an account visit the registration page for our site. If you already have an account, you can login here or by clicking "My Account" on the upper right hand corner of any page on the site, right above the search icon.

Commenters must use their real first and last name and a real email address.
We do not allow profanity, racism, or misinformation.
We expect civility and good-faith engagement.

We cannot always fact check every comment, verify every name, or debate the finer points of what constitutes civility. We reserve the right to remove any comment we deem inappropriate, and we ask for your patience and understanding if something slips through that may violate our terms.

We are open to a wide range of opinions and perspectives. Criticism and debate are fundamental to community – but so is respect and honesty. Thank you.