Symbol of law and justice. Law and justice concept.
Yu was convicted of possessing a microchip prototype design with aerospace and defense uses owned and developed by Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI), a semiconductor company. His lawyers plan to file a post-trial motion for acquittal on his single conviction. (Courtesy of Envato Elements)

On May 26, Haoyang Yu of Lexington was found guilty of possessing a stolen trade secret following a month-long jury trial. The jury acquitted him of 18 other counts of possessing stolen trade secrets, immigration fraud, wire fraud and illegal export. Yu’s conviction is the first in the District of Massachusetts following a criminal trial of this kind – but his lawyers, William Fick and Daniel Marx, contend that Yu was targeted for his race; their pre-trial motion to dismiss the case due to unlawful profiling and targeting Yu for Chinese ethnicity remains pending.

Yu was convicted of possessing a microchip prototype design with aerospace and defense uses owned and developed by Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI), a semiconductor company. Yu worked at ADI from 2014 to 2017, and started his own microchip design firm while still an ADI employee; he used ADI’s microchip design to “manufacture a knock-off” which he began selling prior to ADI’s chip release, per a statement from the office of U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Rachael Rollins. The Lexington Police Department was one of several entities to assist with the investigation.

Fick and Marx applauded the jury’s acquittals of Yu on the vast majority of charges. “We have always contended, and the jury agreed, that Mr. Yu did not commit any wire fraud, immigration fraud, or export violations,” they wrote in an email to LexObserver. They plan to file a post-trial motion for acquittal on his single conviction.

Yu’s sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 15. He faces up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.

A Chinese Americans of Lexington (CALex) volunteer expressed some concern about the case. “Based on my conversations with other community members, race and ethnicity play an important role in this case,” she wrote, speaking to “a collection of input from community members” rather than her personal opinion. “It is not a good use of tax payer’s money for the federal government and FBI [to take] charge of this case and [target] a specific ethnic group.”

A Chinese American Association of Lexington (CAAL) representative wrote that “CAAL leadership don’t know Mr. Yu and his wife personally to make any useful comment,” adding, “This seems to be a very isolated case in the Chinese American community.”

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

Leave a comment
All commenters must be registered and logged in with a verified email address. To register for an account visit the registration page for our site. If you already have an account, you can login here or by clicking "My Account" on the upper right hand corner of any page on the site, right above the search icon.

Commenters must use their real first and last name and a real email address.
We do not allow profanity, racism, or misinformation.
We expect civility and good-faith engagement.

We cannot always fact check every comment, verify every name, or debate the finer points of what constitutes civility. We reserve the right to remove any comment we deem inappropriate, and we ask for your patience and understanding if something slips through that may violate our terms.

We are open to a wide range of opinions and perspectives. Criticism and debate are fundamental to community – but so is respect and honesty. Thank you.