
Lexington Public Schools implemented a spending freeze on Dec. 4 after hiring 25 new staff this year to accommodate an unanticipated influx of students with extra needs.
Those new hires support students who have contractual requirements such as Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), or 504 Plans, both of which outline what specialized services a student with a disability needs to succeed in school.
“We are so happy to have all of the students we have in our system, and we’re working hard to support them and we believe they deserve an excellent education,” Julie Hackett, superintendent of LPS, said. “But we have budgetary challenges at the same time that we have to manage.”
Hackett said the district predicts there will be a budget shortfall of between $1.5 million and $2 million due to the growth of the special education program.
David Coelho, assistant superintendent for finance and operations at LPS, sent a memo to principals and department leaders, alerting them of the spending freeze on Dec. 4. Hackett alerted the School Committee on Dec. 13 through a memo of her own.
In her letter, Hackett states that since 2021, there has been an increase in special needs among existing students as well as an increase in students with IEPs moving to town.
Coelho said he believes the reason for that influx is because Lexington is “a drawing card for people to come to because we have such high level services.”
LPS has a budget of about $141 million for fiscal year 2025, approximately 86 percent of which goes toward salaries and 14 percent to expenses. LPS is working to protect programs from being eliminated and staff from being laid off, Hackett said in her memo. Teachers’ salaries are “fairly fixed,” she told LexObserver, but LPS is considering reducing costs through attrition.
To save money, LPS will prioritize hiring candidates with less seniority if and when new staff must be hired.
“If two candidates with similar skills are being considered for a position, and one has five years of experience and a Master’s, and the other has 12 years of experience and a doctorate, we will select the candidate with less seniority, which will put less pressure on the budget,” Hackett’s memo states.
As a result of attrition and slowing hiring, class sizes will likely increase across all grades, Hackett’s memo states. In the elementary schools, there will be fewer classes, each with more students and an aide to help the teacher. Team sizes will increase in the middle schools, and in the already overcrowded high school, classes will accommodate 27 or more students.
“We’ve tried to keep [class sizes] smaller post-pandemic because of the learning challenges for some students, but we think that we’re at a point now where we’ve provided a lot of additional support and we need to be more conservative with those numbers so that we can be able to satisfy all the needs that we have in the system through our budget,” Hackett told LexObserver.
LPS will also conduct a “cost-effectiveness study” on its special education program to see if it’s as practical as it was once believed to be. Many years ago, LPS created the staff-intensive special education program to entice residents with disabled children to enroll them in LPS schools instead of sending them to other districts for specialized education. It was thought that reducing the number of students who attended schools outside of Lexington would save the town money, Coelho said, because the district is responsible for the costs associated with students attending outside programs.
“It can cost $200,000 plus per year per student to place them in other schools, plus transportation,” Coelho said.
By essentially auditing this program, LPS can obtain data and learn whether or not its in-house special education program is cost-saving, and if not, where changes can be made, Hackett told LexObserver.
The study will cost approximately $30,000, which Hackett states will be paid for with “existing resources” in her memo.
LPS will also cut down on professional development expenditures to mitigate the predicted shortfall. That includes ordering catering from Whitsons, the school lunch provider, rather than outside restaurants for professional development days, and sending department heads to local professional development conferences rather than out-of-state.
Hackett told LexObserver the ways in which LPS is planning to cut down on costs is not unorthodox.
“The strategies I listed out in the memo are strategies that are always in place, we are always combing through the budget and looking for ways to save money,” Hackett said. “We have processes and procedures in place so that we are very careful with the town’s resources.”
The influx of students with extra needs is only one piece of LPS’s larger budget puzzle — the uncertainty regarding the future of students living in emergency housing in Lexington could greatly affect LPS’s future budget.
Right now, there are 118 homeless students enrolled at LPS, according to Hackett’s memo, including many refugees living in local shelters. The state pays LPS $104.89 a day to provide homeless children with everything they need to succeed in school, including transportation, lunch, and more. But the state’s program for homeless families is evolving.
Over the summer, Gov. Maura Healey imposed a new limit on families’ stays in temporary respite centers, like the Lexington Armory. She also capped the number of families who could stay at 7,500 and their time in longer-term shelters to nine months.
If students living in shelters are relocated to different municipalities due to Healey’s refinements, they can elect to stay in the LPS system under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. The law gives guardians of homeless children the right to choose where their child attends school, whether that’s their school of origin, or the school in the district they’re residing in.
It’s best for students who are already enrolled in LPS to continue attending school in Lexington because children “have more success when they have continuity,” Hackett said.
“We want to be able to do that because we want kids to have stability and support and not to have things disrupted in their lives constantly,” she said.
In that case, however, “transportation then becomes…more costly,” Hackett said. While the state will continue to pay LPS $104.89 a day to educate a sheltered student who moved to a different municipality, it will not cover the additional cost of transporting them to and from school.
Nonetheless, Hackett advocates for them to stay.
“I believe that children belong here and should be in our school system and should receive the support that they need to be successful in life,” Hackett said.
Many school districts across the state are similarly experiencing budget issues, Hackett notes in her memo.
“Nearly 100 municipalities have sought school-related operational overrides in the last three years with varying degrees of success,” she states, linking to data on operational overrides from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue’s Division of Local Services.
Hackett blames state-wide budget swelling on rising educator salaries and post-pandemic costs for goods and services such as special education tuition and transportation.
“There are social costs when you’re looking at these programs, not just budgetary costs, and this is kind of the balance I’m trying to strike with messaging about the budget,” she said. “We obviously want to have programs that our students need, and we want to do it and manage them in a fiscally responsible way.”

A focus on hiring candidates with the amount of experience is obviously a discriminatory practice. Unclear why this has been approved by the Town of Lexington.
Errata: Previous comment from Cara should read “least” amount of experience.
Not only discriminatory, but often times may not be what is best for the children, or the town as a whole.
Great article! Super informative. In the future it might be helpful for LexObserver to include links to heavily referenced materials (in this case the superintendent’s memo). I’m sure I can find it online, but a link makes it easy!
It’s becoming increasingly clear that we have an incompetent superintendent, whose shortcomings seem to be overlooked by the school committee. And this is before the impact of the affordable housing projects she supported begins to affect the district.
What is her plan for managing the anticipated doubling of the student population? My daughter had 27 students in her class at Estabrook last year, and this was the response from the school committee:
“1) The size of the second-grade classrooms is within District policy. If the student count reaches 27, the teacher contract requires an overflow aide to support the classroom for 2 hours per day. The District would be required to add an additional second-grade class if the class size gets to 31 students. Unlike some Districts in the area, LPS does not have buffer zones that allow individual schools to send new students to a less crowded school. This is not directly related to teacher pay or poor planning.”
This response shows a clear lack of foresight and planning. Lexington residents need to prepare for what’s coming. The superintendent has failed this district (most notably how she handled COVID) and it’s time for a leadership change.
In fully support Dr. Hacket and the school committee.
Could you please site a credible source for “anticipated doubling of the student population”.
Sure, your kids must have great academics and decent class sizes at Lexington schools. Or maybe you live in a different Lexington.
Please, educate yourself about whats coming:
https://sites.google.com/view/lexmbta/Overview?fbclid=IwY2xjawHSi0JleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHSUuzRtPveW_JOmHiwxwdzbr38fWNSR-3OfY4HTlEKCB5qUQC0tdeUIMfg_aem_Qxhb7PUJIhJ_SJIufZIAEg
I quickly looked over this and it talks about the potential building volume from the new zoning rules (which are approved by all of us through Town Meeting) and while there will be an increase in volume, I didn’t find the exact quote about doubling the school population – wouldn’t that require a lot more than the ~1,400 unit proposed?
Unfortunately, 1,364 units is just 10% of whats being proposed. Even a quick back-of-the-napkin calculation makes it clear that a train wreck is inevitable.
I completely agree with your comments. Many Lexington parents have also raised issues with the low quality literacy curriculum that is still being used in our elementary schools. This poor curriculum does not teach kids to read properly and therefore those kids eventually need reading intervention. This support is straining the system because we don’t have enough literacy specialists to support all the students that need it. It’s very disappointing that Julie Hackett and the School Committee continue to put money toward this ineffective curriculum instead of implementing on that works. Parents tried to advocate for something new but Julie wouldn’t listen. MA parents have now filed a class action lawsuit against the publishers and writers in this curriculum. Hopefully change will come soon.
I am completely appalled by this curriculum that was in place for 6+ years. It seems that this year it was quietly changed, and kids have finally started learning grammar properly. It’s just insane that the superintendent and school committee make such significant decisions without informing the public. They did the same with the second language curriculum, which was supposed to start in the 3rd grade. They wasted taxpayers’ money on assessments and studies, yet failed to negotiate with the teachers’ union. No announcement, nothing. They just quietly swept it under the rug.
This kind of behavior is unacceptable. This “cartel” needs to go.
I remember. The Superintendent planned to use COVID money to start the program. It’s a shame it wasn’t implemented.
Thank you for this information and the link Natalia. I had no idea any of this was going on. It’s very disappointing that the remake of Lexington is being enacted without the actions/impacts being widely distributed to the residents so we can get involved before our town is turned into Cambridge.
I discussed these actions with a few neighbors and found them to be in the dark as well. With the old Lexington Minuteman a shadow of its former self, where does one go for local news? My wife stumbled across this publication a week or two ago, but it seems like a lot has been codified as quietly as possible.
Tom, I think we all made a mistake by relying too heavily on those in charge to make the right decisions. It’s clear we all need to get involved now to drive change. Join the Lexington Residents group on Facebook—people are actively discussing these issues there.
At every School Committee (SC) meeting since March 2024 I have been asking the SC to request from the Superintendent an organizational chart that shows all positions and number of people in these positions, short description of each position’s duties, to whom it reports, what is the salary and what percentage of time each position spends in direct services to students. This org chart is CRITICAL to the SC members understanding the budget. It is my belief that LPS employs too many people who are not critical to educating our children.
LPS has a real literacy crisis, since our 4-12 grade students have been taught to read using a discredited curriculum. Many of these students now have to receive support services to bring their reading to grade level. Unfortunately, proper literacy support for these kids is expensive. BUT if the SC demands that many of the positions that do not have any direct student contact are converted into literacy specialists, our budget will not be affected and many of our non-reading kids will be the beneficiaries. When will the SC take charge off the budget and figure out which existing positions are essential and which should be converted into classroom positions?
And while I am talking about the budget, how many years has it been since LPS has built its budget from the ground up? As long as I can remember (I’ve been paying attention since early 1990s’) LPS budget has always been built with percentage changes, but no Superintendent has ever been asked to have every department build a new budget “bottom-up.” *** I expect that we’d find many places where money is being spent in the wrong places. LPS needs modern curricula, great teachers and staff, and healthy and well maintained buildings. I does not need lots of employees who have no face contact with students, and it does not need a 2/3 billion dollar new high school.
Time to be smart about how LPS spends its money
Olga Guttag, former School Committee Member (2004-2007)
***I tried to get this done while serving on the SC, but as a minority member did not get support needed.