Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has often been spotted walking her dog on Lexington’s wooded paths. A quiet neighbor, grandmother, environmental activist and former physician, Stein has held only one elected office, as a member of Lexington’s Town Meeting, the legislative body for the town of 34,000.
But in this year’s high-stakes presidential election, Stein could play a critical role. Her pro-Gaza stance has won her support among Muslim and Arab voters, particularly in Michigan, a key swing state where recent polls show Kamala Harris in a dead heat with Donald Trump.
Stein’s candidacy has drawn the ire of the Democratic Party, and has alienated neighbors, former allies, and even family members, many of whom disagreed with her decision to enter the race, according to several people LexObserver spoke to.
“I worry less about social approval than about children burned alive and crushed in rubble; than about climate collapse (with emissions under Biden and Obama even worse than under Trump and Bush); or about expanding war, with both parties leading the charge towards nuclear Armageddon,” Stein told LexObserver when asked about their opposition to her candidacy. “It’s time to forget the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it.”

In a video announcing her candidacy, Stein pledged to fight “crushing inequality, endless war, [and] climate collapse,” along with the housing and health care crises, student debt, and “diseases of despair,” but her campaign has focused almost exclusively on Gaza. She joined in campus protests at Columbia and Washington University in St. Louis, where she was arrested with 99 other demonstrators, and has spoken at rallies from Washington D.C. to Dearborn, MI, calling for an immediate ceasefire and an end to US military support for Israel. She selected Butch Ware, a professor of Black and Islamic studies at UC Santa-Barbara who has also been outspoken about Gaza, as her running mate. “That is one of the essential reasons why our campaign is in the race,” she told LexObserver.
Although Stein is currently polling at only about 1% nationally, Democrats are taking notice. Last week, the DNC released its first-ever ad targeting a third party candidate, which includes a graphic depicting Stein’s face morphing into Trump’s.
“The Democratic Party of Desperation is smearing us big time right now,” Stein said. “This is a huge badge of honor.”
This rancor is nothing new for Stein. Her disillusionment with the Democratic Party goes back to at least 1998, when she was involved in the push for a Clean Elections bill in Massachusetts. The bill passed, but was repealed a few years later by an overwhelmingly Democratic state legislature. “They repealed a law that we, the people, had passed by a 2 to 1 margin in order to address the fundamental corruption of our political system,” she said. “That’s what made me a political animal.”
Born in Chicago and raised in Highland Park, IL, a leafy Chicago suburb that’s in many ways similar to Lexington, Stein attended Harvard College and Harvard Medical School and settled in Lexington, where she raised her two children. Her work as a doctor led her to activism; seeing the impact of environmental toxins on her patients’ health, she fought coal-fired power plants across the state and a toxic incinerator where Lexington’s trash was burned.
Stein entered her first political race in 2002, as the Green Rainbow Party’s candidate for governor of Massachusetts. She was excluded from the first debate, but, after taking legal action, was included in the second. Audiences said she fared reasonably well against Republican Mitt Romney and two other candidates, but in the end she received only 3% of the vote. The experience seems to have cemented her frustration with the two-party system — and her desire to fight against it. “It’s a very deeply tilted playing field,” she said, recalling that first campaign. “It’s hard to get coverage by the press, your issues are suppressed.” That frustration seems to have spurred her to run again and again.
“I entered that race out of desperation because nothing else was working, but I came out of it with incredible inspiration,” she said.
The next year, Stein ran for Lexington’s Town Meeting and won a seat representing her local precinct, with 539 votes. But there’s little evidence that she distinguished herself in the body of more than 200 representatives. A search for her name in the Town Meeting minutes for the five years she was a member yields only two results, one related to affordable housing, which she favored, and another on the state’s “fast track auction law,” which allowed Massachusetts to auction off land rather than give local communities the right of first refusal. Her work helped defeat the law, she said.
“She was helpful in spurring us to do climate-related things,” said Jeanne Krieger, a member of the town’s Select Board at the time. But neither Krieger nor other members we spoke to had specific recollections of Stein’s time in Town Meeting. In 2010, Stein left before her second term was over to run for governor again.
Stein first ran for president in 2012, campaigning on the idea of a Green New Deal, a version of which was later introduced in Congress by Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey, and helped pave the way for the Biden administration to pass the most significant federal climate legislation to date. Stein received 469,501 votes (0.36%) — more than any woman had ever received at that time, but less than her Green Party predecessor, Ralph Nader, who at his peak in 2000 received 2.74% of the popular vote. Here in Lexington, the incumbent Barack Obama received 12,750 votes to Republican Mitt Romney’s 5,293. Stein got 160.
Stein ran again in 2016, but this time, the race between the leading candidates, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, was much closer, and the stakes were much higher. Stein ran on the same basic platform, courting supporters of the popular progressive primary candidate Bernie Sanders. Stein received a total of 1,457,216 votes — just 1.07% of the popular vote. But she garnered more votes than Trump’s margin of victory in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Had most of those voters cast their ballots for Clinton instead of Stein, Clinton would have won the election.
After the election, reports prepared for the Senate Intelligence Committee found that more than 1,000 of the posts created by fake social media accounts as part of a Russian disinformation effort to help Trump win mentioned Jill Stein.
“Grow a spine and vote Jill Stein,” one hashtag read. Some posts specifically targeted Black voters, promoting Stein as an alternative to Clinton.
There is no evidence that Stein was aware of the Russian campaign. But in the midst of the investigations into Russian interference in the election, video emerged showing that Stein had attended a 2015 dinner in Moscow hosted by the Russian TV network RT and was briefly seated at a table with Vladimir Putin. Clinton called Stein a “Russian asset.” Stein says she attended the dinner to talk about her pro-peace, anti-nuclear agenda, that she paid her own way, and that she didn’t speak to Putin. She cooperated with a Senate investigation into her potential “collusion with the Russians,” which found no wrongdoing.
Stein was out of the public eye for several years after that. She did not run in the 2020 election. She did some work behind the scenes for Green Party candidates for down-ballot offices and on local environmental issues, according to her former campaign manager and Lexington resident John Andrews.
Last month, progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized Stein on Instagram for showing up during elections, but not doing anything in between to build support for her ideas or her party.
“If you run for years and years and years and years in a row, and your party has not grown and you don’t add city council seats and you don’t add down ballot candidates and you don’t add state electeds, that’s bad leadership,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “If all you do is show up once every four years to speak to people who are justifiably pissed off, but you’re just showing up once every four years to do that, you’re not serious. To me, it does not read as authentic. It reads as predatory.”
Stein fired back, blaming “the anti-democratic tactics and strategies that the Democratic Party uses to crush and silence political opposition” for the Green Party’s failure to win elected offices. She pointed to a New York Times article that says Democrats have assembled “an army of lawyers” to challenge the ballot access efforts of third-party candidates.
But Stein didn’t point to any specific political organizing or advocacy work she’s done since she last ran for president.
Stein announced her plans to run in this election back in November 2023 despite protests from friends and family members, who worried about both the personal toll and, perhaps more importantly, the potential to help get Trump re-elected.
“I have made my peace with whatever happens with the election on November 5,” Stein’s husband, Rick Rohrer, said. “What I’m worried about is what will happen with my family on November 6.”
Stein’s focus on Gaza amid continued US support for Israel’s assault has paid off. A poll conducted by the Council on American-Islamic Relations at the end of August found Stein basically tied with Harris among Muslim voters nationally. In Michigan, 40% of Muslim voters backed Stein, with 18% for Trump and 12% for Harris. She was recently endorsed by the “Abandon Harris” campaign, a group started by Muslims in Dearborn demanding a ceasefire in Gaza that now seeks to “ensure the defeat of Kamala Harris at the ballot box.” (The larger “Uncommitted” movement, also started by Muslims from Dearborn, stopped short of endorsing Harris but urged supporters to vote against Trump or third-party candidates that could “help inadvertently deliver a Trump presidency.”)
“A vote for Stein is really a vote for Trump,” the narrator says in the ad the DNC released in swing states last week. The ad then quotes Trump himself: “Jill Stein? I like her very much,” he says. “You know why? She takes 100% from them.”
In Stein’s Lexington neighborhood, blue Harris-Walz signs adorn nearly every yard. But there’s one lonely green Stein sign at the top of a hill. The house belongs to Katie Flynn, whose husband is Palestinian. “My kids are Palestinian, and I couldn’t look them in the eye and vote for Kamala Harris,” Flynn said. “Thankfully in Massachusetts I have the privilege to vote without overthinking strategy, and only with my gut.”

Thank you for a thoughtful article Lex Observer!
Thank you for this excellent article. Lexingtonians have been giften with this amazing leader. Happily voting for Jill Stein because she truly stands for Human Rights. Democratics have lost our trust and hope.
This is the kind of useful reporting that I would expect from a local newspaper, which is sorely missing in so much of the country now. We all owe Lauren and her staff a deep debt of gratitude (and perhaps some financial support) for her bringing us this piece and the Lexington Observer itself. The national media, by making out our neighbor to be merely a spoiler or a Russian tool, has not taken her candidacy seriously. Considering each candidate to be a serious contender for President, no matter their polling, and assessing them on their full merits, is essential to our remaining a thoughtful and free people. The Lexington Observer has done this when our national media has not. This piece reveals what many of us know, that Jill is a well-meaning member of the community who is also not sufficiently prepared to be President of the United States. Just to take one example, those of us who care about the environment all realize why it might be problematic for any politician to point to some of the most deregulation-obsessed administrations of our lifetime as paragons of emissions, leaving out the larger problem that emissions have risen steadily since the end of the Cold War with the exception of when mismanagement by the prior President led to a worldwide pandemic and a shutdown of everything. Clearly, Jill knows this too, and is pushing a talking point so as to challenge the sitting Vice President, yet does not seem to realize as she says this to Lauren that it serves as an implicit argument to deregulate further and weakens the standing of all political parties that look to community action through government, including her own. We should respect our neighbors who are voting for her based on their own hopes, as we expect them to respect us for emphasizing our own values that a leader who can move the country (and the world) forward might need more governmental experience and nuanced appraisal/use of policy-relevant facts than most of us currently possess or typically exhibit in discourse. Freedom means that any of us should have the capability to run for office, if we are brave enough to do it (particularly in an era of resurgent fascism where politicians can be threatened by their opponents). It also requires a press bold enough to simply provide facts and relevant context, so that voters can come to their own justified conclusions. Thanks again to the Observer.
I agree with the above comment that we should have a civilized and fact-based discourse and consider all candidates on their merits. We are also owed a slate of candidates who sincerely want the job.
In her interview with Charlamagne tha god, Dr. Stein was not able to answer the question “How many people are in the House of Representatives?” Her lack of interest in the basic workings of government indicate that she has no intention of becoming the president. And that is the only reason anyone should seek office.
It just shows how “serious” about being in office as she is.
This article reveals Jill Stein as a spoiler. She claims to support the aims of rescuing the climate and preventing human suffering in Gaza and elsewhere. But between campaigns, has she been in the political trenches working hard to pass measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? No. Has she, as a physician, traveled to war torn or impoverished countries to minister to injured or starving people? If so, it is not mentioned here. Between presidential runs, she has done very little to support her alleged goals. Meanwhile, this article points out that in 2016, Stein got more votes than the margin by which Clinton lost to Trump in several crucial swing states. If Jill Stein had not run in 2016, Hillary Clinton would have won and we would not have experienced the trauma of Trump’s presidency. The pandemic would have been handled promptly and competently. Hundreds of thousands of excess Covid deaths would not have happened. This article unmasks Stein as an unserious candidate who does little to advance her noble aims, but stubbornly runs for President mainly to pursue a deep personal grievance against a Democratic party she views as having slighted her. That’s ego, not virtue. I am beyond outraged that Stein’s ego could once again put a now-demented Trump back in the Oval Office.
Lauren and Lexobserver team, I’m always impressed with your ability to write in an extremely measured way. You obviously monitor your diction and sentence structure closely and the result is exceptional, fact-based reporting that gets as close to neutrality as possible. Though I am also very concerned about the election outcome and do wish that for this election she had chosen not to run, I want to urge our community to be respectful to Dr.Stein’s family always. I’m sure this has been a very challenging season for them and regardless of our opinion about Dr.Stein’s decision to run in this race given what we face if Trump wins, her bravery and fortitude must be acknowledged. Dr.Stein is a human being; we don’t know what internal and external circumstances she has faced outside of election seasons. She is a community member whose ultimate position is equity and sustainability, which is sadly a lot more than we can say for many others. Let’s be respectful of that even if we disagree with some of her decisions.
You all know she’s been endorsed by KKK leader, David Duke, right?
I value her as a community member, and I’m down with the message that our two-party system is pretty broken, but I also know what an actual real world vote for her represents. David Duke does too.
Great reporting – thanks, Observer.
With no visible presence or tangible accomplishments between presidential elections – and no prospect of doing anything other than cannibalizing Harris votes during the election – Stein appears to be driven by ego, relishing the role of spoiler, regardless of the long-term harm her candidacy could bring to the nation as a whole. In this election cycle, harm extends to physical well-being and personal agency, among other intimate and near-term risks.
If you believe in the causes you give voice to, there are many other ways to be heard and create lasting change.
Just because you -can- do something doesn’t mean you -should-.
I won’t be jumping on the Jill Stein bandwagon I believe the article is promoting. It is just an accident of fate that she lives in Lexington. She is running for national office. I believe it’s inappropriate for our community newspaper to publish an article like this. Just publishing this article draws attention to her candidacy, at the expense of other candidates. (I apologize for that statement if the Observer is planning on giving equal attention to Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.) Even with the acknowledgment of the impact her candidacy had on the 2016 election, this amounts to free advertising for her campaign. It doesn’t matter what her intention was in attending her dinner with Putin, that fact is she made herself an ongoing prop in Putin’s social media disinformation campaign.
At best, I would say her continued tilting at windmills comes from naiveté and proves she is not even ready or qualified to be president. At worst, she is running with full knowledge that her only role is that of spoiler. Is the future of the country worth the risk of a vote for Jill Stein? I know what my answer is.
Amen, Sen Warren!! Stein is a spoiler for sure!
The “Elizabeth Warren” who commented on this article is not the Senator. There is a Lexington resident with the same name 🙂
Thank you, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Avram Baskin, for telling it like it is.
I would add to your excellent letters that the consequences of Jill Stein’s having run in 2016 include the three Trump appointees that have given the Supreme Court a reactionary supermajority, which led to Dobbs, and large numbers of women dying, and others being badly harmed for lack of reproductive healthcare in a number of states.
The fact that she’s running again for an office she has no chance of winning, but has
a substantial chance of reinstalling a would be tyrant in the White House who would dismantle our Democracy, and “drill baby drill!”, policies that Stein presumably opposes, suggest that her candidacy is indeed ego-driven, as per Senator Warren.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/20/us/politics/jill-stein-harris-trump.html
Ranked choice voting would eliminate the spoiler factor and let people vote their conscience. It’s time to move to a voting system that allows people to truly voice their wishes.
Knowing that Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Paris climate accords, my questions to Jill Stein are…”How will you truly feel if Trump wins the election by the number of votes you receive in a swing state?” Will you claim that to be a victory?
I read an article the other day about how Jill Stein’s family are speaking with her about leaving the contest. She will not even listen to them is what was reported. Hubris, anyone? And that’s the nicest question that comes to mind.
The problems are too big and too deep and the choices facing the world need the hands of a steady, smart, capable person who can LEAD our country and not destroy it.
Anyone — and by this I specifically am addressing Jill Stein — who is doing more to create chaos and instability in this time in WORLD HISTORY should be ashamed of themselves.
I am ashamed that I have at least three things in common with you: Our first names begin with J. We are both women. And we both live in Lexington. Now is NOT your time.
Do the right thing NOW and step out of the race and support Harris/Walz. The future of the entire democracy is depending on them winning. Please.
Hello, recall Ralph Nader who sorta owns Bush’s election and thus 8 lost years on climate.
Stein cannot be doing to win- she has 0% chance. Can’t be doing it to make a point- Trump taking power is the point.
So sorta has to be about ego. But boy does the obit pay for it….